Skippr Docs

Appearance

What a Good First PostgreSQL Integration Looks Like ​

July 2026

The smallest production PostgreSQL setup is one database, one read role, and one clear extraction contract: table list or query, with passwords kept out of config.

Short Answer ​

A good first PostgreSQL integration is one reachable host and database, one read role, and one explicit extraction boundary. The docs allow field-based config with host, port, user, password, and database, or a connection_string if that is how your team manages Postgres connections. Either way, the first good production version chooses whether the source contract is a short table list or one custom query.

That choice matters because PostgreSQL can act as both an operational system and a clean analytics handoff. If you want named tables such as public.orders, keep them visible. If you need one curated query, make that query the contract and do not pretend table discovery still defines the interface. WAL logical replication is a separate milestone. It becomes useful after the team already trusts the base shape and keys.

Why Teams Struggle with This ​

PostgreSQL starts look simple, which is why teams often leave the real production boundary undefined. They connect successfully, then only later decide what counts as the source of truth.

  • The Postgres host and port still have to be reachable from the runner before any higher-level design is meaningful.
  • A user with too many privileges increases blast radius without improving extraction quality.
  • Using query and tables interchangeably creates confusion because they represent different source contracts.
  • Logical-replication CDC needs extra setup, so it is better not to overload the first integration with that work.

How Skippr Handles It ​

Skippr keeps PostgreSQL flexible without making it vague. You can use discrete fields or a full DSN, and you can keep the secret-bearing value in an environment variable while the source target stays visible in config.

That makes the smallest production setup easy to explain: one database, one read role, one table or query boundary, one first extraction. It is a good handoff because another engineer can see what the source is pointed at without seeing the password.

  • Supports field-based config or a full connection_string.
  • Keeps passwords or DSNs outside the file through env interpolation.
  • Supports explicit tables or a custom query.
  • Can later extend to WAL logical-replication CDC with supported destinations.

What the First Useful Version Looks Like ​

The first useful version is one Postgres database, one read role, and one extraction target such as public.orders or a single query over a trusted view. That proves reachability, auth, and the real source contract together.

If CDC is part of the roadmap, design the role and source tables with that future in mind. But let the first production integration succeed as a clean batch read before replication complexity gets added.